Former FBI counterterrorism agent Tim Clemente warned that twisted political rhetoric, including misinterpreting Trump’s comments about a “bloodbath” in the auto industry, may have fueled recent assassination attempts against the former president.
During CNN’s Sunday coverage of the second attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump, former FBI counterterrorism agent Tim Clemente offered a sobering analysis, pointing to political rhetoric as a likely motivator for the attack. Speaking with host Erin Burnett, Clemente highlighted how certain statements, including Trump’s remarks about a "bloodbath" for the auto industry if his Democratic opponent wins, have been twisted to suggest violence would ensue if Trump lost, potentially fueling extremist actions.
“It’s unprecedented in a civilized society, and I think we’re becoming more and more uncivilized, sadly, with the political diatribes that are going on,” Clemente said, reflecting on the escalating tensions in American politics. He added that the finger-pointing at Trump, especially around his "bloodbath" comments, has been misinterpreted in a way that paints him as inciting violence, a narrative that he believes has contributed to the assassination attempts.
Clemente drew parallels between the U.S. and third-world countries where dictatorships are often characterized by violent power struggles. “That kind of verbiage is something you use in a third world country when you’re talking about a dictator, and that sadly has led to, I think, these attempts on Trump’s life,” he said, emphasizing the need to lower the temperature in political discourse.
Calling for a return to civility, Clemente urged Americans to see political opponents not as enemies but as fellow citizens with differing views. “You and I might not agree on 50% of what we care about politically. It doesn’t matter,” he said. “We have to get back to that talk about our differences, but not in a way that makes us feel like you’re the enemy and I’m all good.”
Clemente’s comments come as the political climate grows increasingly polarized, with heightened fears that violent rhetoric could lead to more attacks, not just on political figures but on the broader fabric of American society.