In a decisive move reshaping the landscape of political conduct within government ranks, the Office of Special Counsel (OSC) announced a significant policy shift regarding the enforcement of the Hatch Act. This change signals an end to leniency for White House staff and marks a pivotal moment in the effort to uphold the separation of political activities from official duties.
The federal body tasked with enforcing the Hatch Act, aimed at preventing government employees from blending official duties with political activities, announced a significant policy shift on Monday. Head of the Office of Special Counsel, Hampton Dellinger, declared an end to leniency for White House staff who breach the Act, opting instead to refer such cases to the Merit Systems Protection Board for potential disciplinary action.
Previously, the OSC had directed complaints about White House personnel to the president, but Dellinger cited legal misinterpretations and quorum issues at the MSPB as reasons for the change. Emphasizing parity among government workers, Dellinger stressed that White House employees should face consequences like any other federal worker.
Both Trump and Biden administrations faced scrutiny under Dellinger's predecessor for Hatch Act transgressions. Biden's press secretary, Karine Jean-Pierre, and deputy press secretary, Andrew Bates, were cited for using "MAGA" to criticize Republicans. In contrast, Trump adviser Kellyanne Conway was implicated in numerous violations, despite OSC's recommendation to President Trump to dismiss her.
Under the new directive, the OSC gains another avenue by involving the MSPB, and Dellinger pledged to pursue investigations into former employees who resigned before facing scrutiny. Additionally, revised standards aim to address the blurred lines between political speech rights and maintaining a nonpartisan bureaucracy.
Former restrictions, such as allowing political displays post-election, are eliminated, with Dellinger emphasizing a year-round ban on political candidate displays in federal workplaces. He underscored the need to strike a balance between employees' speech rights and taxpayers' expectation of impartial governance.
The OSC clarified that while certain workplace speech close to elections may constitute impermissible political activity, using terms associated with candidates or parties in policy discussions is permissible if linked to government programs or proposals. Express advocacy for campaigns and the use of candidate-associated words or images remain prohibited under the Hatch Act.
.png)