Top Points:
Rigging and Corruption Across All Five Trump Cases: Megyn Kelly argued that all five court cases against Donald Trump are politically motivated and marred by corruption, bias, and abnormal legal proceedings, designed to prevent him from running for office in 2024.
Specific Case Breakdowns: Kelly provided a detailed breakdown of each case, including the Manhattan DA case, Georgia election case, classified documents case, January 6th case, and the civil fraud case in New York, highlighting how each is driven by political animus rather than legitimate legal concerns.
Weaponization of the Justice System: Kelly emphasized that these cases reflect a broader strategy to weaponize the justice system against Trump, with prosecutors and officials using their positions to tie Trump up in legal battles for political gain.
Full Report:
Megyn Kelly, the former Fox News anchor, made waves during her recent appearance on All In when she exposed what she described as the rigging and corruption present in all five court cases brought against former President Donald Trump. When asked if she would attribute bad results across all the cases to rigging, Kelly responded with an emphatic, “100%, yes.” She further detailed how each case has been marred by corruption, bias, and abnormal legal proceedings intended to damage Trump politically and personally.
Kelly’s breakdown of the five cases sheds light on what many conservative commentators and Trump supporters see as coordinated legal assaults designed to prevent Trump from regaining political power.
The Manhattan DA Case
In discussing the case brought against Trump by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, centered around payments made to Stormy Daniels, Kelly highlighted the unprecedented nature of this case, pointing out how the charges rely on a novel legal theory that ties state-level charges to federal campaign finance laws. She argued that Bragg's case has been viewed by many legal experts as weak, and that the district attorney is driven more by political animus than genuine legal concerns, calling Bragg "a George Soros-funded prosecutor who doesn't like to prosecute any crime in New York City...except if your name is Donald Trump."
The Georgia Election Case
Kelly also turned her attention to the case in Georgia, where Trump is accused of attempting to overturn the results of the 2020 election. According to Kelly, this case also reeks of political motivation. She noted how the case was corrupted by the inappropriate relationship between Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis and an Special Prosecutor Nathan Wade.
The Documents Case
Kelly also tackled the classified documents case, which has been halted because of the revelation that Jack Smith "wasn't properly appointed and isn't the right counsel."
"But there are other issues. They haven't even gotten to presidential immunity there, and so, that one's going nowhere as well," said Kelly.
The January 6th Capitol Riot Case
Addressing the January 6th case, Kelly described it as a political witch hunt aimed at framing Trump as responsible for the Capitol riots. She emphasized how Democrats and the media have relentlessly tried to pin the chaos of that day on Trump, despite the former president urging his supporters to remain peaceful. Kelly argued that the case's selective prosecution of Trump is part of a larger effort to prevent him from holding public office again.
“They’re trying to rewrite history and make Trump a scapegoat for something he did not orchestrate,” Kelly said.
The Civil Fraud Case in New York
Lastly, Kelly criticized the civil fraud case brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James, who has accused Trump of inflating property values to obtain favorable loan terms. Kelly cited the case as another example of a politically motivated attack and pointed out how James has openly stated her goal was to bring down Trump. She questioned the unusual way in which this case has been handled, including the pursuit of extreme penalties, suggesting it reflects personal animosity more than legitimate legal concern.
"There's no victims. The banks who are involved said, 'We didn't lose a penny. What are we doing here? We weren't damaged.' Nobody was complaining except [Letitia] James who ran for office saying, 'I will get him,' commented Kelly.
Conclusion
Kelly argued that the courts have been co-opted by political actors who are determined to prevent Trump from running in 2024 and reclaiming the White House. According to Kelly, the abnormal legal proceedings, media bias, and outright corruption in these cases are evidence that the justice system is being weaponized against Trump.
Kelly's remarks have resonated deeply with Trump supporters, who view these cases as part of a broader campaign to undermine their candidate. As Trump continues to face legal battles on multiple fronts, Kelly’s dissection of the rigging and corruption at play is sure to fuel the ongoing debate about the integrity of the American legal system.
References:
Megyn Kelly on All In exposing rigging in the court cases against Trump.
.png)