In the eleventh hour of President Joe Biden's term, a shadowy alliance of investors orchestrates a daring push for amnesty, thrusting the nation into a high-stakes showdown between political survival and the crumbling pillars of immigration policy.
Investors who played a significant role in President Joe Biden's election bid are now pushing for a last-minute amnesty benefiting around 1 million undocumented migrants. This move comes amidst a growing public backlash against the influx of low-wage migrant labor, as indicated by several recent polls.
According to Kevin Lynn, the founder of U.S. Tech Workers, Democratic donors and investors backing migration policies are feeling the pressure of Biden's declining popularity in the polls, leading to a sense of desperation. Lynn warns that if Trump were to win the election, there could be a significant push for mass deportations, fueled by the disillusionment caused by Biden's handling of migration, including the influx of approximately 10 million legal and illegal migrants.
The prevailing pro-migration narrative touted by the establishment is crumbling, and in a last-ditch effort, they are intensifying their efforts just before the election, according to Lynn.
However, this late-stage amnesty proposal poses a dilemma for Biden and his campaign, as it could divert attention away from other progressive causes, rallying diverse party activists behind a singular migration agenda. Lynn describes it as a risky move that could jeopardize Biden's chances in the upcoming election, as it threatens to alienate left-wing interest groups aligned with other causes.
Despite potential resistance from Biden's team, there are concerns that White House policy staffers, unchecked by effective leadership, might push through the amnesty plan, reflecting a lack of control within the administration.
The proposed amnesty plan involves granting "immigration parole" status to approximately 1 million undocumented migrant spouses of American citizens, offering them work permits and temporary residency for two years. Critics argue that this move would incentivize marriage fraud and draw parallels to President Obama's DACA program, which provided work permits to 800,000 undocumented immigrants brought into the country as children.
Andrew Arthur, a former immigration judge associated with the Center for Immigration Studies, has raised legal doubts about the proposed "parole in place" plan, highlighting its questionable legality.
.png)